Relational Expectation Setting

Our world is becoming more and more transactional, and unfortunately, that includes how we communicate the things that matter most. Many of our important emails are drafted by AI agents. If the recipient doesn't fully understand what's being asked of them, they, in turn, ask their own AI agent to fill in the gaps. And so a quiet cycle of assumption and misalignment begins.

Transactional expectation setting states: "Here is what I need you to do." It clearly states the task, outlines the parameters, and sets a deadline. It effectively checks an item off your list, but later you find yourself disappointed, frustrated, or confused when it fails to secure the results you actually wanted.

Relational expectation setting looks and feels different. It sounds like: "Here's what we're trying to accomplish, here's why it matters, and here's what success looks like. I want to make sure you have what you need to succeed. Let’s discuss." It's about getting the right things done while building trust along the way.

Transactional expectation setting communicates the assignment. Relational expectation setting creates the conditions for shared ownership and excellence.

Checking for Understanding

The critical piece transactional expectation setting misses is checking for understanding. Without it, an initiative is like a rocket launch that only cares about a smooth liftoff, leaving the project to get lost in orbit, running on the fumes of best intentions.

Checking for understanding happens when two or more people connect to confirm alignment, surface areas of concern, and define excellence together. If a leader does not define excellence, their followers will do their best to interpret it — and interpretation, by nature, varies. For one person, "a polished presentation" might mean a visually rich deck with extensive research and detail. For another, it might mean a concise three-slide summary ready for discussion. Both team members may wholeheartedly believe they've fulfilled the expectation. If the leader wanted one or the other, the unspoken gap is what determines which direction was "wrong."

Checking for understanding paves the way for the relational, two-way nature of shared ownership: it lets leader and follower both carry responsibility. The follower receives context and clarity. The leader trusts that they will be asked questions when they come up. Neither has to guess. Both move toward the same outcome with a shared understanding of what matters.

Shared Ownership Makes Excellence Possible

Shared ownership makes 360 degrees of accountability possible. When a team member owns the outcome, not just the task, they hold themselves accountable to the purpose behind the work, not only the person who assigned it. They notice when something is drifting off course before anyone has to tell them. They bring the same commitment to excellence to the parts of the job no one sees as they do to the parts that are highly visible. This fosters a common commitment to excellence.

Shared ownership cannot thrive in a transactional environment, where every interaction is a hand-off. In a purely transactional environment, employees are simply "at bat," swinging on whatever comes across the plate. They may swing hard and give their best effort at first, but over time, an employee who is only ever handed tasks, never the purpose or the trust behind them, starts to swing a little less hard. Fewer questions get asked. Fewer problems get flagged early. The work still gets done, technically, but without ownership team members drift into a passivity that is satiated by the minimum-viable product.

That is disengagement, and it is a real threat. It shows up in the quality of what reaches the customer. It shows up in turnover, in the energy of a team, in how much a leader has to personally carry because no one else feels responsible for carrying it with them. An organization full of disengaged employees is an organization quietly losing ground, one transaction at a time. 

Disengagement cannot coexist with excellence. This is why relational expectation setting isn't a nice-to-have. It's a make-or-break leadership priority.

Five Elements of Relational Expectation Setting

1. Clarity of Purpose. People engage more fully when they understand why their work matters. Connecting a responsibility to the broader mission gives people the context to make better decisions when circumstances shift.

2. Defined Standards of Excellence. Strong leaders make the invisible visible. Rather than saying "make this great," they articulate what great actually means: the non-negotiables, what deserves the most attention, and sometimes, what excellence does not look like.

3. Shared Understanding. Clarity isn't achieved when something is said, it's achieved when something is understood. Leaders often become frustrated thinking, "But I already told them what I wanted." The real question isn't whether you communicated the expectation. It's whether you and your team member walked away with the same picture of the outcome. Strong leaders confirm alignment rather than assume it. It’s also important to communicate in which areas the team member can be creative, make the call, or take a risk.

4. Individualized Guidance. Every team member is different. Some need more context before starting; others prefer to chart their own path. The better you know your people (their strengths, communication styles, and patterns) the better equipped you are to meet them where they are and row in the same direction.

5. Two-Way Dialogue. Expectation setting isn't a one-way transmission of information: it's a conversation. When people trust that questions will be met with respect rather than judgment, they raise concerns early, before the cost of misunderstanding grows. That is shared ownership. And shared ownership is a key to excellence. 

The Leader Sets the Conditions for Excellence

Before delegating an important responsibility, take time to consider: What is the purpose of this work? What does excellence look like? What might I be assuming is obvious (that actually isn’t)? And once you've communicated the expectation, check for understanding, invite questions, and build shared ownership of success. The best results will follow shared ownership, not a transaction.

_____

Found these insights helpful? Explore these concepts in greater depth through SLG’s free 5-Day Email Course: How to Lead a Team that Gets Results. You'll receive practical leadership tools, guided reflection questions, and video lessons to help you turn insight into action. Enroll today and begin building a team that thrives.

‍

‍

‍

Elise Harlow joined Severn Leadership Group as a Fellow in 2018 and serves as an SLG EQ-i coach. Her career spans executive leadership in operations, organizational design, mergers and acquisitions, and culture transformation across education organizations, nonprofits, and small businesses.

‍

‍